Anapoly Notebook | Digital Garden
Bootstrap prompt clarification
Clarification sought by the AI
Before starting task 1, I’d like to clarify a few points so I can give you the most effective advice on improving your prompt:
-
Scope of "young people" – Are you focusing on university students only (as suggested in warnings_about_ai.txt), or more broadly on school pupils, early career professionals, etc.?
-
Length and format of short-form essay – Are we aiming for something like 500–800 words, op-ed style, or a shorter, sharper think piece?
-
Use of literature – When you say “review the literature,” should that be limited to the project files and your prior knowledge, or should I also pull in external, up-to-date sources?
-
Tone and audience – Should the essay lean towards academic argument, persuasive public writing, or more of a reflective/ethical think piece?
-
Weighting of dangers vs. positive framing – Should the essay focus almost entirely on the risks, or also acknowledge responsible/beneficial uses of AI for young thinkers?
Once I have these answers, I can refine your prompt so it fully leverages my capabilities and sets up the initiation phase for success.
Clarification provided to the AI
- The scope initially is broad. Later, during analysis and synthesis, we will focus on university students.
- Change the goal to be a standard essay. This will be a concise piece of reflective writing, length up to 1,500 words.
- Pull in external, up-to-date sources.
- The essay should lean towards a reflective/ethical think piece.
- The focus will be on if and how responsible uses of AI can overcome the dangers posed to young people.